Monday, January 21, 2008

There Will Be Blood

I thought it was a great movie until Anderson botched it completely with that last, ham-handed scene. That last scene didn't even feel like it belonged to the same movie. The tone was completely different and the jokey violence was like something out of a Tarantino movie. And to build all that up just to slam religion (literally)? Man, what a let down. Not as bad as the raining frogs in Magnolia, but close. I think Anderson would be better off if he quit trying to inject "big ideas" into his movies. Hard Eight, Boogie Nights, and Punch-Drunk Love were much more effective because they weren't bogged down with some profound statement Anderson was trying to make (the other problem being that Anderson's profound statements aren't all that profound).

5 Comments:

Blogger Rambler said...

I don't know, I always kind of liked the raining frogs, not as much as "respect the cock" Cruise, but still...

6:17 PM  
Blogger Gina said...

One big ham-handed, turkey-brained, cheese-toothed waste of a good samich.

4:57 AM  
Blogger ope said...

uh oh.

i liked the frogs too. hell, whats more, im an unabashed tom cruise fan! wildly underrated.

8:50 AM  
Blogger here. said...

i won't go where my scientologist buddy ope is going, but tha frogs were the bomb ... well, literally

10:14 AM  
Blogger Brian said...

Speaking of ham-handed profundity, did you see MICHAEL CLAYTON? It's like one of those old Flip Wilson story jokes where you wait two hours for the punchline. About 40 minutes in I was praying for it to be over soon, having run out of Buncha Crunches. Good ending, but my wife thought the story was more TV movie than big screen.

6:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Free Blog Counter

Blog Counter